On February 23, the golfing legend Tiger Woods was in a serious car crash that left him seriously injured and requiring surgery. Now, the true cause of this crash has finally been revealed.
Fox Newsreported that Los Angeles County Sheriff Alex Villanueva gave a press conference on Wednesday in which he revealed that Woods crashed because he was driving at an unsafe speed. He was reportedly driving between 84 and 87 mph when he first made an impact and was at 75 mph when his car hit the tree. Woods was driving this fast despite the fact that the speed limit in the area was 45 mph, more than half the speed he was at when he was going his fastest.
Investigators found no evidence of any impairment and said that Woods had no memory of the wreck. Villanueva attempted to vigorously deny that Woods was given a preferential treatment of any kind in this case.
“I know there’s some saying somehow he received special or preferential treatment of some kind, that is absolutely false,” Villanueva said. “There were no signs of impairment. Our primary concern at the scene of the collision was his safety. This is where you have to switch gears and make sure the person can survive and receives medical care.”
The sheriff went on to explain that police cannot obtain a search warrant without any signs of impairment, claiming that there was no special treatment here because these rules would apply to anyone in Woods’ position.
Will you join President Trump’s new social platform when it comes out?
More from Wayne Dupree
Though Villanueva had said last week that the cause of the crash would not be disclosed to the public, Woods gave him permission to give this press conference to reveal to the world what happened.
Here’s what happened:
After the crash, police searched the golfer’s SUV’s black box, with Los Angeles Sheriff’s Capt. James C. Powers saying that it revealed that Woods’ acceleration pedal percentage, which is the pressure applied to the accelerator pedal at the time of the crash, was at 99% at all of the areas of impact.
“There was no evidence of braking throughout this collision,” Powers said.“It is speculated and believed that Tiger Woods inadvertently hit the accelerator instead of the brake pedal causing that 99% grading on the accelerator pedal.”
They say he was unable to maneuver a tricky curve in the road. Strange that he wouldn’t put his foot on the break.
Police never took any blood samples from Woods, but if they had, they could have tested them for any evidence of drugs and alcohol. Woods was left with significant leg injuries after the crash, and he is now recovering at his home in Jupiter, Florida.
Attn: Wayne Dupree is a free-speech champion who works tirelessly to bring you news that the mainstream media ignores. But he needs your support in order to keep delivering quality, independent journalism. You can make a huge impact in the war against fake news by pledging as little as $5 per month. Please click herePatreon.com/WDShowto help Wayne battle the fake news media.
When you think about buying toothpaste from your grocery store, you probably aren’t thinking about all the toxic chemicals that could be lurking inside. And that doesn’t just mean store brands. Even the name-brand toothpaste, like Crest and Colgate, is not nearly as good for you as your dentist may be leading you to believe.
Triclosan, for example, is a popular ingredient in many types of toothpaste. Its primary use, according to the FDA, is to prevent bacterial growth. The FDA admits that recent studies on the ingredient have shown that triclosan alters hormone regulation in animals, but continues to state that it is not yet known to be hazardous to humans.
That doesn’t sound so bad, right?
Well, it wouldn’t be — if triclosan hadn’t initially been registered as a pesticide with the EPA in 1969. Somewhere along the way, it went from being a classified pesticide to being present in all types of clothing, kitchenware, soaps, toothpaste, and other body care products.
Triclosan actually has been found to be harmful to humans by several scientific studies, which have linked it to heart failure, heart disease, muscle impairments, and disrupted hormone regulation.
As if that isn’t scary enough,sodium fluoride— which is even added to most water supplies — is also quite toxic to humans. Added under the guise of boosting the strength of our teeth, sodium fluoride is a known neurotoxin that can come with severe side effects. A study published in 2014 by The Lancet Neurology systematically reviewed major industrial chemicals that function as neurotoxins. Among them was fluoride, which is one of several identified chemicals that were explicitly linked to the rising rates of autism, dyslexia, and other cognitive impairments in children. The researchers artfully referred to the situation as a “pandemic of neurotoxicity.” They also go on to call out the United States regulatory agencies for not requiring safety testing on industrial chemicals like sodium fluoride, and also for requiring an incredible high proof of harm before stepping in to impose regulation.
Fortunately, there are plenty of natural toothpaste alternatives on the market today. In addition to things like baking soda or activated charcoal, oil pulling is becoming an increasingly popular choice for alternative dental health.Oil pulling is an ancient Ayurvedic practicethat uses pure oil swished around in the mouth to draw out toxins. Oil pulling is a great addition to an all-natural oral hygiene routine.
“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.”
-Franklin Delano Roosevelt
ON APRIL 15, 2020, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer issued “Executive Order 2020-50“, under the terms of which people infected with respiratory illnesses declared to be ‘COVID-19’ (C19) were transferred from hospitals into nursing homes across the state. Those nursing homes, of course, were filled with residents especially vulnerable to fatal outcomes from exposure to such dangers due to age and co-morbidities typical to the elderly.
The transfers were engineered despite the fact that normal overall hospital capacity was never “overwhelmed” by C19 cases. What’s more, dedicated field hospital facilities had been built (at enormous expense) to provide enormous additional capacity where the infected seniors could be cared for properly while being prudently isolated.
In fact, that percentage maybe even higher. Serious questions remain as to the possible low-balling of that nursing home fatality figure due to quirky rules about how designated nursing home residents outside of the facilities for some reason after becoming infected (such as hospitalization) are accounted for by the state, and because of Whitmer’sunexplained intransigence on the release of data.
Tellingly, these efforts in Michigan were part ofa nationwide projectto optimize a seemingly anticipated extraordinary volume of mail-in ballot predicated on the C19 pretext– which, at that time was waiting out of sight. Especially telling, the efforts were targeted specifically at “battleground” states, indicating that they were not a general expression of political principle but in service to a specific plan of action.
By late December of 2019, the hysterical drumbeat over the virus had begun. This panic-mongering went on with increasing intensity (continuing to this day). The character and specifics of the unwinding narrative suggests the purposeful creation of an atmosphere in which widespread fear of voting in person and massive mail-in voting was inevitable.
But there was a problem. Even though C19 had reached vast numbers of Americans (and everyone else), pretty nearly nobody was dying, making the media-generated panic wide but very shallow.
Not exactly a “run for the exits” horror fest… and so, not nearly good enough for some purposes.
On March 24, the CDC re-issued its “call ’em all C19 deaths” instruction,in even stronger terms. The number of alleged C19 fatalities began to rise a bit.
But the clock was running on the “two weeks to flatten the curve”, and people were talking about the harms to be expected from shutting down the economy for even that brief period. More was needed.
On April 6, 2020,the New York Times arguedthat American governments must, “learn how to frighten [people] into acting for the common good.” (The rag wisely refrained from overtly saying anything about the virtues ofa “new Pearl Harbor”, doubtless realizing how awkward that could be, but that’s clearly where it was going…)
As if to illustrate the “problem” bothering the Times (and its fellow travelers), on April 15, 2020, thousands and thousands of irate Michiganders (including Doreen and me) shut down Lansing in ‘Operation Gridlock‘:
The marks were getting uncooperative and positively unruly.
Even three weeks after the CDC double-down on its sloppy-reporting instruction and Andrew Cuomo’s own, first-in-the-tainted-waters nursing-home-infection order on March 25 had caused a rapid increase in the number of ascribed C19 deaths, Michiganders hadn’t yet been terrorized into mindless capitulation to the plague narrative and gubernatorial diktats. Quite the contrary, in fact. If an agenda was in play requiring the fright recommended by the New York Times, more was apparently had to be done.
IT WAS AT THIS POINT, April 15, 2020, the day of Operation Gridlock, that Gretchen Whitmer slides outEO 2020-50directing the insertion of people infected with C19 (or some kind of respiratory disease, anyway) into Michigan’s highly-vulnerable nursing home populations. The effect was a decided shot in the arm for Michigan’s C19-ascribed death-rate, and for acceptance of the governor’s continuing flurry of what Michigan’s Supreme Court later found to be entirelyillegal executive orders(andwhich remain illegal under the same rulingeven though now issued by Michigan’s Public Health Director).
And no surprise… When you very much want the appearance of big numbers of fatalities due to C19, what better way than to send people supposedly sick from the virus into places where people are going to die in large numbers from anything to which they are exposed, or just of old age and/or pre-existing conditions, to which you can then ascribe C19 as the cause?
Plus, it’s possible to argue (however disturbing and unforgivable it would be)– either to oneself or to others who had to be placated or brought along– that it’s all for the greater good; people had to be made very much afraid for their own good, so they would fall in line with the believed-necessary mitigations. And besides, these folks were going to go soon from one thing or another anyway, right?
ANOTHER UNSURPRISING EFFECT of EO 2020-50 and its consequences– in harmony with the continued relentless panic-mongering by the media and many officials in the federal and state government– was a massive embrace of, and seeming justification for– mail-in voting in Michigan. This absentee-ballot event– remember, the one seemingly anticipated by the Democrat lawsuits in 2019– was marked by a series of bizarre tally-activities and -abnormalities.
The oddities in Michigan played out in much the same fashion– indeed, in exactly the same fashion– as those in other battleground states.
NOW, I WANT TO REITERATE that I’m just spitballin’ here– that is, speculating. I’m not formally accusing anyone of anything, nor pretending to know what really happened, or what was in anyone’s mind.
I leave it to each reader to decide what picture has formed when the dots are all connected. But I urge everyone to have the courage and the maturity to really look at that picture, keeping in mind Edmund Burke’s wisdom:
“There is no safety for honest men but by believing all possible evil of evil men.”
…and the cynical but knowing observation by FDR with which this article begins.
What’s been going on in America over the last 18 months is HARDBALL. It’s past time for people to awaken to that fact. Here’s some more wisdom with which to punctuate all the foregoing:
“A nation of sheep begets a government of wolves.”
-Edward R. Murrow
NOTE: For a complete recital of all the significant facts related to the C19 panic-attack,see this.
“Universal Mail-In Ballots” Are The Perfect Set-Up For Election Fraud
Those who pooh-pooh such concerns thereby mark themselves as guilty.
ELECTION FRAUD under conditions of “universal mail-in ballots” is the simplest thing. Here’s how it can be done:
A given election district (precinct, city, county, etc.) hasxvoters on the rolls.X— especially in urban districts– is heavily-padded with the unpurged dead and otherwise departed, and with folks who have registered but never bother to vote. The names of everyone inxare in a computer database.
By the end of election day, a portion ofxwho we’ll cally1have requested and been sent absentee ballots (and probably have mailed them in)– but in theory, everyone has been sent a ballot for mail-in voting, whether requested or not. Another portion ofx(we’ll call themy2) have cast ballots at the polls.
The names of everyone in bothy1andy2are in a computer database by the end of election day.
NOW, WITHIN A FEW BUSY HOURS after the polls have closed and the number of extra votes needed has become apparent– say, by 3:00AM to 4:30AM the next day–y1can be added toy2and the total subtracted fromx,yieldingz–the number of fraudulent ballots that can be tossed into the pot, all marked for the fraudster’s candidate, without exceeding the theoretical (or plausible) maximum for the district.
Every one of these fraudulent ballots can even be associated with the name of someone on the voting rolls who did not cast a conflicting ballot, with this being especially easy if the signed envelopes in which these ballots are supposed to have been mailed to the district clerk are trashed. And all this can be done by a very small number of conspirators in the right places.
The tell-tale sign would be a spike in vote totals for the fraudsters’ favored candidate(s) in those early hours of the day after, like this, for instance:
Unfortunately for the cause of election integrity, without opposition-verified signed envelopes for every absentee ballot said to have been received, it’s hard to prove the fraud. This is especially true if the media refuses to acknowledge even the possibility of election fraud, and the official oversight responsibility is in the hands of partisans favoring the benefitting candidate, whether or not those officials are conspirators themselves.
Indeed, this is why the outcome of any election in which voter identification is not reliable is considered inherently untrustworthy.
Bottom line: mail-in ballots are risky to election integrity; massive mail-in ballots are virtually certain to yield untrustworthy results; and combined with lax voter ID requirements, massive mail-in ballots are inherently unreliable and prone, if not intended, to facilitate fraud– easy peasy, and seriously sleazy.
“All governments are run by liars and nothing they say should be believed.”
Recent badly-educated generations of Americans probably don’t realize that “capitalism” is NOT an economic “system”. Rather, it’s just a label dreamed up after the fact for the interactions and evolved institutional formalities arrived at by the spontaneous interactions of people operating as economic agents in a free market, while equipped with property rights. Nobody planned or imposed “capitalism”.
But the folks behind “the Great Reset” have plans for everyone. They mean to impose “capitalism reimagined”, which means, NOT what arises when people are free, but what takes place when people are NOT free– that is, when YOU are not free, but are, instead, a slave to those behind “the Great Reset” and their agenda.
These “Great Reset”, “Build Back Better”, “New Normal” people are the enemies of freedom– YOUR enemies. They are in the process of conquering and enslaving you and your children, and most Americans don’t even know what’s going on, due to having been kept ignorant of economics, history and civics by the early saboteurs of the assault, who occupied the American education system to prepare the ground.
A California police officer was in the right place at the right time when a frantic mother flagged down his patrol car. Her unresponsive toddler had been exposed to the opiate fentanyl.
Officer Aaron Khamosh managed to revive the child using Narcan, a drug developed to reverse the effects of an opiate overdose.
In a Facebook post, Concord Police Department stated Khamosh was patrolling on March 26 when he was flagged down on Salvio Street by a woman. Her 2-year-old was unconscious on the back seat of a car and wasn’t breathing.
The quick-thinking officer went to assist and began chest compressions and CPR on her son.
“[T]he officer could not find a pulse,” the department stated. “As the baby grew pale, the mother revealed that the child ‘got ahold of some fentanyl’ and needed Narcan, a drug used when a person is having an overdose.”
Khamosh was able to administer two doses of Narcan and the toddler started to breathe on his own.
Shortly afterward, first responders arrived on the scene, taking the toddler to John Muir Health at Concord Medical Center for further assessment.
The department warned the community that fentanyl is an “extremely dangerous and potent opioid” and commended their officer’s actions, “We are grateful the baby will survive this ordeal and for Officer Khamosh’s quick thinking.”
The toddler was transferred to UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland and was taken into the custody of Child and Family Services. The mother was arrested and charged with child endangerment and possession of a narcotic.
Meanwhile, hundreds of comments from appreciative citizens praised the officer on Facebook.
“God’s blessings to you, Officer Khamosh, and to all good police officers in our country,” wrote one person. “Thank you so much for your commitment to a job that many people are trying to vilify.”
“Thank you for your heroic action(s)!” wrote another. “Running toward a vehicle, even one flagging you down, put yourself in harm’s way not knowing what awaited you. I am glad you were able to save that innocent child’s life!”