Election fraud evidence keeps piling up; the feds begin overtly using social media as censors; a rebuttal to a despicable and agenda-driven slur upon Thomas Jefferson; and observations on the pseudopandemic.
Among other ways in which the Biden/Harris claim to the White House is unraveling…
Those just sitting on the sidelines and spectating had better get up and suit up.
In rebuttal of a despicable and agenda-driven calumny:
Other Voices (with an important afterword)
Spotlights on the past that help bring clarity to the present:
“There are two distinct classes of men…those who pay taxes and those who receive and live upon taxes.”
Illuminating anniversaries of this week:
July 19- In 1588, the Spanish Armada is sighted in the English Channel. In 1979, the Sandinistas overthrow the U.S.-backed Somoza dictatorship in Nicaragua. In 1990, Pete Rose is sentenced to five months imprisonment for tax evasion. In 2007, the Dow Jones closes above 14,000 for the first time ever.
Anniversaries of interest for each day of this week will be found throughout the newsletter below.
HEY, People! Please don’t just read what I post here (or anywhere), and nod your head sagely or approvingly and then move on to other things. I don’t post in order to affirm your sense of things. I post in order to equip you with perspectives and arguments with which to educate others, and in the expectation that you will forward my posts to other people (or direct them to those posts). PLEASE do those things.
We won’t win by YOU knowing what I present. We will win by LOTS OF OTHERS knowing what I present.
New Evidence Emerges Of Election Fraud In Georgia
…and underscores the critical importance of vigorous, further investigation there and in the other locations where bizarre, late-night reversals in favor of Joe Biden and other Democrat candidates took place, like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.
LAST WEDNESDAY EVENING, Tucker Carlson reported on recently discovered, indisputable evidence of large-scale vote fraud in Fulton County, Georgia. That ~7 minute report can be seen below:
IN MICHIGAN, the Court of Claims has ruled that Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s October, 2020 instruction to city clerks throughout the state to “presume” the validity of signatures on absentee ballot return envelopes (rather than verify those signatures against the qualified voter files, as required by law) was illegal. Hence, every vote tallied from most absentee ballots in Michigan last November was illegally counted, and the state’s actual, valid election results are dramatically different from those certified in December and January.
(I strongly urge any qualified Michigan witness who has not yet done so to send me the affidavits in connection with the foregoing for which I have asked you through Shane, Rosanne, Marian, Tim and Patrick. Time’s a wastin’.)
ALTHOUGH DEFINITIVE INFORMATION is so far unavailable, it appears that the forensic audit in Maricopa County, Arizona has uncovered a very large difference in the actual election outcome from what had been previously declared and certified. Even a relative handful of corrections would easily reverse the mere 11,000-vote margin purportedly putting the state in the Biden/Harris column.
The Democrat-run county continues to obstruct the audit in every way possible (in a pretty clear indication of guilt), and has so far prevented a final report of the results. But in addition to the obstruction, the indisputable fraud caught on video in Fulton County, Georgia, which was committed by those sharing the interests of the folks running the election in Maricopa County (and Detroit, Michigan, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) supports the reasonable expectation that in the end, the audit results will not favor those interests.
SPEAKING OF PENNSYLVANIA, a forensic audit is about to begin there, as well. Pennsylvania is notable for having counted a huge number of absentee ballots purportedly received well after election day, along with many other “irregularities” (read: indicators of systemic fraud).
The Democrat rationale for the supposedly late-arriving ballots is simply that a bunch of post offices throughout the state screwed up (unlike in pretty-nearly every other place in the country)– and that, in Ben Franklin’s home state, no less! Far more likely, all things considered, is that Pennsylvania Democrats realized at the end of the counting on Election Day that Biden was losing, and more “votes” in his favor had to appear. Or so concludes the well-educated cynic in me.
ALL-IN-ALL, IT IS INCREASINGLY CLEAR that there are more Americans who didn’t want Joe Biden and Kamala Harris in the White House and Democrats in control of Congress than did, in November. And I think I can safely say that the number of Americans who don’t want Biden/Harris in the White House and Democrats in control of Congress has been growing every day since January 20, as the the lunatic policies of these corruptocrats are rolled out.
(NOTE: To see how widespread mail-in voting can easily be made the tool of election fraud, click here.)
“Like a muddied stream or a polluted fountain is the righteous man who gives way before the wicked.”
“I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something. What I can do, I should do and, with the help of God, I will do.”
“Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them, and these will continue till they have been resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they suppress.”
“A nation of sheep begets a government of wolves.”
-Edward R. Murrow
“Be the change you want to see in the world.”
The Assault On Liberty And The Rule Of Law Under The Pretext Of COVID-19 Accelerates
Those just watching had best wake up and get onto the field, because it’s all on the line now.
NOTHING COULD BE MORE CHILLING and more frankly corrupt than the skin-crawlingly-casual announcement by the Biden administration that it is specifying speech and speakers for censorship by social media platforms:
Make no mistake. Identifying speech as “misinformation” is a directive to the social media administrators to suppress the disfavored posts and/or deplatform the speakers.
Make no mistake. The pretense of a “public health” dimension to the targeting will be used to suggest an especially-urgent and compelling imperative to the practice, and to invite scorn and even demonization for the disfavored speech and speakers (whose “disinformation” is not only at odds with “the science”– goes the insinuation– but promotes danger to us all). But that “logic”, once accepted in the context of the “pandemic”, will inexorably be extended, in time, to any other hobgoblin trotted out by those in command of the mainstream media (among which must now be included much of what is called “social media”).
The state and media moguls are NOT valid (or even trustworthy) authorities on what is and what is not “misinformation”. In fact, the state is prohibited from acting as though it is, or can be, such an authority, and from co-opting private actors into doing so on its behalf:
“[W]e cannot improve upon what Justice Jackson wrote for the Court 70 years ago: “If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.” Barnette, 319 U. S., at 642.”
Agency for Int’l Development v. Alliance for Open Society Int’l, Inc., 133 S. Ct. 2321 (2013) (Emphasis added.)
This prohibition extends to opinions about what is or is not “the science” as much as to any other subject, and the pretense that if we all don’t get on the same page everyone is going to die! changes nothing.
Indeed, the state is a notorious purveyor of disinformation– think “Russiagate”, Iraqi WMDs, Gulf of Tonkin; Pearl Harbor and the Lusitania, just to name a few prominent examples.
I urge everyone to SCREAM adamant opposition to this “disinformation” policy. It is meant to be a fatal blow to liberty.
REGARDING “OFFICIAL” POSITIONS about vaccination and the what is and what is not “disinformation”, let me offer a few items that might be helpful in sorting things out:
(This assertion– based on a careful analysis of a New England Journal of Medicine report– has seen a blizzard of adverse “fact-checks” posted on the net. All of the “fact-checks” seem to skip past the substance of the analysis.
That substance is that while the overall cohort of 827 pregnancies examined for the report had a miscarriage rate of ~13%– a figure heavily emphasized by the “debunkers”– the majority of those miscarriages occurred in the 127 women who were vaccinated in the 30 days prior to becoming pregnant or within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. THAT group had an 82% miscarriage rate. See more on this here.)
If you are fearful of the disease, YOU get vaccinated. I don’t need to be vaccinated in order for you to be as safe as you can be made from anyone getting the jab; further, as shown in the Israeli report above, my getting the “vaccines” wouldn’t keep me from getting infected and being able to spread the disease to you, anyway. See your own damn common sense for additional bases for this point.
Finally, regarding the “variants” (“Delta” or otherwise) and the effort to make them the perpetuation of the “pandemic” panic: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
DESPITE ALL THE FOREGOING FACTS (or perhaps in a nod to their accuracy) those with an interest in seeing other people injected (an interest somehow never explained) are escalating pressure tactics against folks disinclined to cooperate. See the treatment of the subject in the following somewhat amusing (but really rather chilling) video:
BTW, CHECK OUT my new armband:
You can learn what is meant by “Control Group”, and get your own armband, at the website indicated.
“It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error.”
-United States Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson
A Few Words About Thomas Jefferson
…in rebuttal of a despicable calumny of which this great man is lately the target.
I READ AN OPINION PIECE the other day on the renaming of a school in Falls Church, Virginia from Thomas Jefferson Elementary to ‘Oak Street Elementary’. The change is a now-typical effort to appease vicious narcissists who imagine themselves the sole legitimate arbiters of what is worthy of public acknowledgement, much less admiration.
In the course of my reading, I was afflicted with several references to Thomas Jefferson as a “rapist”. The slur is based on the proposition that Jefferson fathered children with Sally Hemings, one of his slaves (with the subtext being that “consent” is impossible of the subordinate in a power relationship, therefore any relations between the two was automatically rape of Hemings).
There are several problems with this reflexive calumny.
THE FIRST PROBLEM with the Thomas Jefferson-Sally Hemmings assertion is that the evidence regarding the fatherhood of Sally Hemming’s Jefferson-related children has always pointed strongly toward Randolph Jefferson, Thomas’s brother. Randolph was a regular and welcome guest in Thomas Jefferson’s slave quarters, which by all accounts were warm and lively spots for evenings of music, fun, and good company.
All of Hemings’ children were born during the period between Randolph becoming a widower and his eventual remarriage in 1809, and only after Hemings had returned from France, where she had traveled with Thomas Jefferson as caretaker of his young daughters. Three of Hemings’ children were given names from within Randolph’s family– Harriet, Beverly and Eston. And, of course, the much-ballyhooed DNA link purporting to show a connection between the Hemmings children and a Jefferson does not establish which Jefferson may have been the father.
THE SECOND PROBLEM is the fact that Thomas Jefferson was devoted to his wife, and grief-stricken to the point of near-paralyzing depression upon her untimely death in 1782. He was also a gentleman.
At the same time, the prospect that Jefferson would have lacked for enthusiastic female companionship from whatever quarter he may have sought it (or been found within, to be the one sought, rather than the other way around), is absurd. Jefferson was a man of staggering accomplishment and the highest possible manner, as well as very affluent, and famous throughout the Western world.
Jefferson would have had his pick of any woman or women he wished and been pursued by a multitude whether he willed it or not. He had no need to have his way by coercion, whether situational or otherwise.
Sally Hemmings was apparently very well-regarded by Jefferson, and very likely felt much affection for Jefferson, as well. The odds are very high, it would seem, that if, indeed, any children of Sally Hemmings were in fact by Thomas Jefferson, and not Randolph, it is only because an affectionately-disposed Sally Hemmings took him to her bed, rather than the other way around.
Worthy of note is the fact that while in France with Jefferson, Sally Hemmings was a free young woman. She negotiated an agreement with Jefferson to return to America as his slave in exchange for a promise of personal privileges and the emancipation of any children she might have (by whatever father)– a promise faithfully kept by Jefferson. Clearly, Hemmings recognized Jefferson as an honorable man, not a rapist, and clearly her time as his slave prior to France was anything but intolerable or cruel.
ALL TOLD, the appellation of “rapist” in regard to Thomas Jefferson is a despicable effort to dethrone a giant among historical figures of America and indeed, the world. The object is to tarnish and erode the structure of liberty and rule of law serving sovereign individuals loosely organized in a constitutionally-limited republic that comprises the great American Experiment to which we was so significant a contributor.
Those responsible for deploying the slur are the lowest of the low. Those guilty of buying into the slur, and acting to erase Jefferson from America’s memory with the renaming of buildings and such, are ignorant fools who shouldn’t be in charge of naming their own pets, much less public property.