GOD does not want you to retire. He wants you to renew, repurpose and still serve HIM. – Pastor Vladimir Savchuk
GOD does not want you to retire. He wants you to renew, repurpose and still serve HIM. – Pastor Vladimir Savchuk
Do you have a favorite quote from the Bible?
Many of us have certain verses or passages we turn to for comfort and inspiration. You may have even memorized some of them. Quotes are powerful because they teach us how to live.
Humans have collected quotes and sayings for thousands of years. They can shape your mindset and worldview. As author Ward Farnsworth says, people have an “appetite for well-expressed wisdom, motivational or otherwise.”
To be honest, I’ve never been all that great at memorizing scripture so I don’t judge you if you can’t recite chapters of the Bible. But I have spent enough time there to know when something doesn’t belong. What’s funny to me is the number of people who say things they think are in the Bible, but aren’t.
So for a little bit of fun, I created a list of the seven most popular sayings I’ve many people think are in the Bible but aren’t. Some may be funny, and others may make you raise an eyebrow. Let’s dive in, shall we?
Have you ever been in a bad situation that turned out alright?
When you were in the middle of the storm, you had no idea how things would turn out. The solution often comes in an unforeseen way — a check in the mail from a bill you overpaid, someone who hurt you suddenly tries to make amends. Circumstances you never imagined turned your situation around.
My entire life I’ve heard people say, “God works in mysterious ways.” It’s a true statement, but those exact words aren’t in the Bible. They’re the opening lines of a poem called “Light Shining Out of Darkness” by William Cowper.
There are plenty of verses in the Bible about the mystery of God and how His ways are unknowable to humans, such as:
Who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been his counselor?” (Romans 11:34, NIV)
This is one example of many. But you won’t find the line from Cowper’s poem anywhere in the Bible.
Christianity and money seem to be at odds with each other. After all, Jesus says it’s impossible to serve God and wealth (Matthew 6:24). And pastors who preach the evils of money will point to a verse from the New Testament.
For the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs. (1 Timothy 6:10, NIV)
The eagle-eyed reader will notice a key difference in the original statement, “Money is the root of all evil,” and the scripture reference. The writer of 1 Timothy doesn’t make money the root of all evil, rather the love of money. Why is that difference important?
Money itself is neutral, neither good nor evil. The author uses the word philarguria, which means extreme greediness. Bad things happen when your love money warps your sense of right and wrong.
Money is not the root of all evil. But extreme greediness causes a person, church, or company to harm others in their quest for more.
If Jesus was American, this quote would make sense. Pull yourself up by your bootstraps, work hard and God will meet you halfway.
This all sounds inspirational, but it isn’t biblical. If anything, the Bible says exactly the opposite in many places.
In my distress I called to the Lord; I cried to my God for help. From his temple he heard my voice; my cry came before him, into his ears. (Psalm 18:6, NIV)
God does not demand strength, but He gives it to us when we’re weak. He does not require your maximum effort before He extends His help or grace to you. He only requires your trust.
A favorite adage of Abraham Lincoln, this quote has several origin stories. Most scholars believe it is a medieval Persian adage popularized by the English poet Edward FitzGerald.
While “This too shall pass” isn’t in the Bible, there are plenty of references to the temporary nature of life.
The life of mortals is like grass, they flourish like a flower of the field; the wind blows over it and it is gone, and its place remembers it no more. (Psalms 103:15–16, NIV)
Although not in the Bible, these four words pack a lot of truth. Everything — good or bad — is temporary. It’s a freeing thought if you allow it to be one because it reminds us the bad times pass, and the good times are valuable because they are fleeting.
Tell that to Job in the Old Testament. Tell that to Jesus in the garden of Gethsemane. Frankly, tell that to anyone who has ever gone through a crisis or tragedy.
God will — in fact — allow you to face things you can’t handle.
This quote is so popular it’s almost anathema to say it isn’t in the Bible, but it isn’t. While it’s true that God will always take care of you, scripture is full of people undertaking trials that are more than they can handle.
The closest thing to the quote the Bible says is:
No temptation has overtaken you except what is common to mankind. And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear. But when you are tempted, he will also provide a way out so that you can endure it. (1 Corinthians 10:13, NIV)
As you can see, the Apostle Paul is talking about temptation, and he says God will provide a way of escape “so you can endure it.” But to endure something means you can withstand it.
I don’t pretend to understand why God allows bad things to happen. But God will you to face challenges that are too much for you. But even in darkness, God offers you his strength.
It’s funny how any quote in Elizabethan English gets attributed to the Bible. It’s probably because many people associate the Bible with the King James Version.
This popular saying is, of course, from Shakespeare’s Hamlet.
I don’t think there’s an analogous verse to this anywhere in the Bible. You might even say the entire concept is unbiblical. Reliance on God begins where self-reliance ends. But I’ll leave that for another day.
This is one of those quotes that sound so good because it’s close to what the Bible actually says. On top of that, it seems like something Jesus would say.
But it isn’t.
Of course, Jesus talks about loving your enemies (Matthew 5:43-48). But when it comes to sin, his advice is to look inward.
“Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye?” (Matthew 7:3-4, NIV)
In calling out the hypocrisy of judging others, Jesus sets everyone on equal ground. There’s no use in looking down on others because you think they don’t measure up. Worry about your mess instead of trying to dig up someone else’s.
Instead of loving the sinner and hating the sin, Jesus asks us to love the sinner and hate our own sin.
When I was in seminary (school for pastors) we had a running joke. Whenever someone said something was in the Bible that wasn’t, we’d say it must be from the Book of First Opinions. I can tell from all the misattributed Bible quotes I’ve heard through the years, First Opinions is a pretty long book. It doesn’t need anything added to it.
…where real knowledge– and actual solutions– intersect with real Americans!
A Thoughtful And Persuasive Rejection Of mRNA “Vaccines”
As resistance to the “vaccine” scam widens and deepens, a very articulate voice is added to the conversation from a place where this sort of narrow-eyed consideration might not have been expected, and which is all the more welcome and significant for that reason.
“There is no safety for honest men but by believing all possible evil of evil men.”
CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP CARLO MARIA VIGANÒ has recently shared a letter he sent October 23, 2021 to Cardinal Luis F. Ladaria S.J., Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Archbishop José Gomez, President of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, as well as to all the bishops of the United States of America. Viganò presents a carefully reasoned, heavily supported argument against the mRNA “vaccines” being pushed on the American people and others around the world with a manic and relentless ferocity– despite the long-standing and ever-growing evidence of their worthlessness as remedies against C19 and of their significant adverse effects.
I’ve reproduced the letter, with its voluminous supporting footnotes, below, and will follow it with some comments. Please read Viganò’s presentation in its entirety, and don’t be put off by it beginning with some discussion of a position taken by the Catholic church in a December 21, 2020 ‘Note on the morality of using some anti-Covid-19 vaccines (sic)’ (which is an addition to the Vatican’s document collection known as the ‘Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’ and which focuses on the question of taking vaccines or “vaccines” developed with the use of tissues from non-spontaneously-aborted babies).
Viganò’s references to the earlier ‘Note’ is to distinguish his letter, the primary focus of which is on the practical realities of the “vaccines” and the moral considerations arising from those practical aspects themselves– considerations which apply with equal force regardless of one’s views of the use of aborted fetal tissue in the development and manufacture of the “vaccines”.
Here is the letter:
Comments In Brief
Short takes on selected items lately in the news, such as “reparations” for illegal immigrants, gender assignment, quirks in last week’s election reporting, and more.
THE BIDEN REGIME’S systematic attack on America has taken another bizarre turn with the proposition of “reparation” payments to illegal immigrants who were separated from the children they irresponsibly brought with them when crossing the national border. The storyline is that such separations were somehow unprecedented and tortious.
But neither of these propositions is true. People being incarcerated pursuant to criminal charges NEVER have their children put in the jail cell with them. The idea is insane, and to have incarcerated the innocent children in the detention facilities with their charged parents is what would have been legitimately tortious.
Likewise, the story that the Justice Department (sic) is floating– that the (originally $450,000 per adult illegal involved, now morphing into a different, as-yet-unstated alternative figure) “reparation” payment is a “settlement”. This bs is a contrived rationale meant to suggest that Biden & crew are protecting the rest of us from a higher obligation if these ridiculous claims went to trial.
In fact, call me a cynic, but I suspect that the very idea of “claims” on the matter was dreamed up by someone in the Biden camp itself, and then proposed to the supposed “victims”…
Other Voices (followed by an important afterword)
“The Public Good” Isn’t Mark Zuckerberg’s– Or Congress’s– Priority
by Thomas L. Knapp
Facebook “whistleblower” Frances Haugen, the Washington Post reports, has “repeatedly accused [Facebook CEO Mark] Zuckerberg of choosing growth over the public good.” The Post‘s headline puts it a slightly different way: “Growth over safety.”
The meaning of “growth” in this context is pretty obvious: Zuckerberg’s company makes a lot of money, and he wants it to make even more.
The meaning of “safety” is somewhat more nebulous. Facebook spokeswoman Dani Lever refers to “difficult decisions between free expressions and harmful speech, security and other issues” before going to a place that should chill the blood of anyone listening:
“Drawing these societal lines is always better left to elected leaders which is why we’ve spent many years advocating for Congress to pass updated Internet regulations.”
The Post story opens with a more accurate account of what Lever proposes: